TheMillerCircle.org

Americans have adopted the habit of letting a small number of people make our foreign policy and deciding when we go to war. George Bush and the neocons proved how easy it is to do this with our invasion of Iraq, when perhaps less than a dozen people in the government decided to go to war and enlisted a willing, compliant press to help them make the case. If a few of those in the press had their sons and daughters called up into the war by a draft, we might have had a less compliant press and we might have imposed a built-in brake on runaway militarism. Lawrence Davidson has written a piece for Juan Cole’s website that deals with the issue of what happens when our foreign policy decisions are made by a small cluster of people. What happens is that a lot of innocent people die.

• Continue reading or Leave a comment... (0)

Few of us understand what is behind the sudden Russian invasion into Georgia. Georgia is an ally of the West and its current President, Mikheil Saakashvili is a U.S. educated lawyer turned politician. If you listened only to the mainstream media in the US, say for example Brian Williams or Katie Couric, you have the impression that the Russian invasion is their attempt at Cold War Revivalism and an act of pure aggression. When you hear such declarative statements coming out of our chief media hypes, you know there is something wrong. And so there is.

A thoughtful discussion of this issue can be found at FAIR, a site that I visit often for gaining additional insight into a number of issues. FAIR attempts to contrast the media reports on issues, with a more substantive examination of the relevant information. Based on their summary, South Ossetia and the similar enclave of Abkhazia have been largely independent of Georgia since the breakup of the Soviet Union. Russia has had troops in that region since the early 1990s. Their purpose has been to protect the strong separatist sentiment against periodic attacks by the Georgian army/influence and in the past combat actions have taken place in the region. Earlier this month, fighting broke out between the Ossetia separatists and the Georgian army who tried to reclaim dominance over the disputed region through their own military actions. According to reports from Human Rights Watch shelling of civilian regions has taken place against Ossetians and significant numbers of them fled across the border into Russia, though some later returned.

• Continue reading or Leave a comment... (0)

It is quite likely that this story is not over, but as of now, Bush has had to cave-in to al-Maliki and accept the principal of troop withdrawal in Iraq. The Status of Forces agreement (SOFA) that he hoped to get signed with Maliki has regressed to an "understanding" between the two leaders. Ever since the terms of the SOFA he was pursuing became widely known and characterized as an excessive agreement that would give American troops autonomy within Iraq for years to come, the Iraqi parliament, but especially al-Sadr, has objected strongly to the agreement and claimed that by signing it, Maliki would give Iraq’s sovereignty away. Maliki was strongly advised by just about everyone not to sign it. Although we don’t hear about it, the Sadrists have weekly demonstrations against the SOFA terms. The popularity of US troop withdrawal is spreading.

By deciding to stand with his fellow Arabs on the SOFA issue, Maliki’s action underscores the complete lack of authority or influence that Bush has in Iraq: lame duck President and brain-lame leader. So, for Bush to conceal this slap in the face, he needed new words to describe what will be troop withdrawal and he chose "time horizon" to escape the true implications of this agreement, which, in reality, reflects the lack of an agreement. So far no definitive time-table for withdrawal has been identified, but Obama was quick to point out the true meaning of this understanding: that it underscores the fact that Iraqis don’t want American troops in their country and many are calling for a specific time-table now.

This new development puts McCain in a difficult position, as he has always been talking about fighting terrorists in Iraq as our principal reason for staying there. But, apparently, the government of Iraq, or the one we setup to do our bidding, does not feel that terrorists are that much of a problem, rather the persistence of American troops in Iraq is a more significant problem for them. McCain is going to have to find new wiggle room for this one and of course, Bush doesn’t feel he has to help him out. What this will do for the future of oil contracts between Iraq and the oil giants like Shell and BP remains to be seen. We may see the beginning of a process that favors China’s Sinopec oil over Hunt or Russia’s Lukoil over Shell. Bush continues to show that he truly has the Medusa Touch rather than the Midas one. But, as Peter Dickson has said, “As these fig leaves drop to the ground, they are exposing raw geo-strategic objectives that were present in the original calculations of Republican foreign policy experts going back to the early 1990s, a desire for a firm U.S. foothold in the Middle East to protect the West’s access to oil and to defend the state of Israel from, then, primarily its Arab enemies.” There aren’t many fig leaves left.

Bush was between a rock and a hard place on this one, as he couldn’t push the SOFA too far, lest he be accused of pursuing imperial designs on Iraq, which is what he had in mind all along. From the time he came into office, when he wanted to adhere to the Paul Wolfowitz idea that America needed a new front to replace the lack of one from the collapse of the Cold War. Well, Bush’s bold new plan for America, a new permanent war footing in the Middle East appears to have an ending to it coming up. For most of us, it can’t come too soon.

• Leave a comment... (0)