The Great Depression for young people

Posted on August 3rd, 2010 in Culture,Economy,Education,Government,Politics by Robert Miller

If you have a son or daughter between the ages of nineteen and twenty-nine, looking for work, trying to restart their career or trying to catch on in another location, you have undoubtedly learned first-hand how difficult it is for them to get a job, or if one does find work, how much the jobs being offered these days are dead-end positions, with little chance for advancement and a limited future compared to what one might have experienced in any other recession in memory. Perhaps you are fooled by the numerous job postings for positions that don’t really exist because they have already been filled by an internal candidate. Universities have a lot of these “jobs posted.”  If you find yourself in this position, you have an extra motivation for being outraged at how we have handled this deep recession and how unfairly we have distributed the burden of this costly, wasteful and corrupt financial meltdown. It is an outrage that we have allowed the Wall Street financiers who created this fiscal crisis, to reward themselves with huge bonuses, using the justification that “we deserve it because we are making money again.” The reality is that without the Federal funding they received, none of them would be making money and many of them might not have made their mortgage payments on time.  A huge component of our taxpayer-financed bailout for Wall Street was given to those who were speculating in the market and did not deserve the rescue they received, anymore than we would think of compensating someone who lost their mortgage while betting on the roulette table in Las Vegas. But those are the types that got a lot of our money. I think Naomi Klein referred to this as the biggest class transfer of wealth in history, moving gigantic sums of money from the middle class and poor to the rich.

A gripping story, describing three generations within a family (the Nicholson family in Grafton, Mass) who experienced three different transitions in our economy, including the post-WW II, post-Vietnam and today’s recession, was published a few weeks ago in the New York Times. For the millennial generation of 18-29, the unemployment rate, officially at 14 percent, approaches the level  for that group during the Great Depression. But, now add to that the 23 percent that have stopped looking for work, based on Bureau of Labor statistics, and you come up with a whopping unemployment rate of 37 percent, the highest it has been in more than three decades and within the range of the 1930s. For young adults seeking work today, this is their Great Depression. Adult unemployment in the Great Depression reached about 20% of the work force (though numbers for this period are not as accurate as today’s; some numbers that are higher for unemployment during the depression did not include classifying workers in emergency work, like the temporary work created by Federal jobs programs, etc as being employed).

Among the millennial generation, a college education helps, but the unemployment rate among college-educated young adults is currently at 5.5%, or nearly double what it was on the eve of the Great Recession in 2007. That is the highest level by two percentage points, since the bureau began keeping records in 1994 for those with at least four years of college. A college degree is no longer an insurance policy against prolonged unemployment. We have hollowed out our economy and exported many would be good paying jobs. So far there are no signs that things are getting better for any group of workers in our economy, quite independent of their level of education. Indeed, recent economic forecasts suggest that our economy will contract before it expands, as stimulus money runs dry and nothing is available to pick up the slack.  Europe’s decision to introduce an anti-Keynesian fix to their problems, beginning with Greece, is compounding the issues we face in reaching for a more global and balanced economic recovery. So what happened?

A major fault line in our economic recovery strategy was the insufficient level of the stimulus package we engineered to soften the blow of the collapse. If we had invested somewhere between two and three times what we did invest as our stimulus package, we surely would have been seeing more light at the end of the tunnel by now (too much of the stimulus package was in the form of tax breaks, which are often not used or used late). Very likely, we would have started seeing new job growth through a stronger nurturing of the new economy we will require,  as new businesses could have been generated based on the richest resource we have–our scientific and technological skill level, which now lies fallow because of poor investment decisions and too much money spent on propping up banks and corrupt financial institutions. This unfortunate outcome, the lack of a sufficient Keynesian response to our financial collapse, has left us with rich bankers and unemployed young people. Is that an even sensible trade? Where will our economy come from that we need in order to generate good-paying jobs that can fill the void and the reduce the vast unemployment debt we have accumulated as the biggest obstacle for our future? Right now we seem to be content to let the bankers get away with it and allow our young people to suffer. They are paying the real cost of this economic disaster.

The youngest member of the Nicholson family, caught in exactly this circumstance, remains optimistic about his future, a very different outlook compared to those who went through the Great Depression in the 1930s. Let’s hope we can right our ship in sufficient time to reward his optimism and start generating the new economy by investing in the one area where we stand a chance of regaining leadership–the art and science of saving our planet and learning to live within the limitations of  finite planetary resources. Are we that stupid? Have we been out-Foxed? Is corporate power too much for us to resist and prevent us from reshaping our economic foundations? I don’t think so, but these numbers for the unemployment among young people must become more broadly known and right now the traditional media that we rely on for news refuses to get down and dirty in the places we need in order to flush out and reveal the truly suffering class, our youth, who are currently spared from despair by their innate optimism. How much longer can that last? It would be better for all of us if it didn’t last much beyond tomorrow because it is fixable.

As a companion to the worst recession since the Great Depression, we have a political and financial system that got embedded in the army and acquired the art of generating financial bubbles. Those same people that gave us our bubbles, including the dot com and the sub-prime mortgage fiasco, have given us a solution by a massive transfer of wealth that has yet to be recognized as such. Scott Nicholson’s good paying job went into buying a Goldman Sachs executive a new house and a new boat and a twenty five year lease on an expensive boat slip in Long Island.

According to Lou Dubose, editor of The Washington Spectator (highly recommended), here is what the banking industry visited on our economy: $14 trillion in lost household wealth; 8 million jobs gone, not yet returned or even on the horizon (thus the need for brand new ones); 200 community banks closed and more than $14 trillion in bailouts accompanied by a staggering increase in deficit spending needed to keep the economy out of a depression (it just wasn’t enough to give us a good jump start). The credit default swaps that swamped our economy were created by speculators that didn’t actually own the stock in question. What they made was a bet about whether one stock might default and another investor gave them  credit default swap insurance against that happening. Neither investor actually invested in the company per se. By the time credit default-swap trading destroyed the economy, 90 percent of the traders were speculators and many of them were banks. Furthermore, it was the Wall Street bond lawyers who wrote the “Commodities Future Modernization Act” that Phil Gramm held up as the wave for our new future in 2000. With the final regulatory constraints out of the way, over the counter derivatives went from $100 trillion in 2000 to $600 trillion when the economy collapsed in 2008–that was 10 times the GDP of the entire world! Graham was Wall Street’s operative in the Senate, but the bill had strong support from Clinton’s Treasury Secretary (Larry Summers–now in charge of Obama’s National Economic Council). Not surprisingly that bill also had the strong endorsement of Alan Greenspan. The same people who engineered our financial meltdown are now engineering our recovery. Any wonder why we are not seeing anything close to a recovery? Is there any doubt why the recovery that was engineered for us to enjoy is not enjoyable at all? Obama hired the wrong team. We need a new one. For starters, I would recommend Joseph Stiglitz.

RFM

    Print This Post Print This Post

The Senate Reconciliation bill brings student loan reform

Posted on March 30th, 2010 in Economy,Education,General by Robert Miller

In the same vote that brought us healthcare delayed, the Senate reconciliation bill brought us a new edge of  progressivism,  delayed far too long in the form of a new Federal program governing student loans for college.  Hidden in the healthcare reconciliation bill passed by the Senate last week, the government took over the entire student loan program, eliminating banks and providing projected savings to the government of about $ 87 billion over a ten-year period.  Obama signed the bill into law yesterday, so that beginning July 1, 100% of college loans will be given and administered by the government. There is a slight improvement in the interest rates, from 8.5 to 7.9% over the bank route, though that does not seem like a giant breakthrough opportunity for debt seekers. But, we did it, we nationalized student loans and the persistence of Fire Dog Lake in promoting this bill may have been central to its passage, by use of their sign-up sheet. The savings from this arrangement will be used to fund more Pell grants and allow them to be indexed to inflation for the first time ever.  A shortage of Pell grants in recent years will be fixed by this bill so that 100% of qualified applicants can receive support. Whereas Pell grants used to cover 75% of college expenses in years past, that number is down to 35%, so pegging the program to inflation should help keep the loan program viable for students. In time, about 8 million students are projected to have their college chances significantly improved and avoid dropping out because of insufficient funds.

This bill sailed through the house, but got blocked in the Senate where all good things come to an end. But the clever tactic of including it in the reconciliation process (part of the savings from the new student loan bill will help pay for the new healthcare insurance bill) dropped it into the can-do box under the radar screen.

Student loans began with the Federal Family Education Loan Program, created in 1965. Under Clinton, the Department of Education began its own direct loan program and most schools would sign up for one vs the other (bank vs Fed), not both. At that time, the Federal Government would set the rates and terms. Once at 20% of all student loans, as our economy went south, the percentage of direct Federal loans has grown, now at about 35% and soon to be 100% of all new student loans. Banks can still give loans, but they will not be secured by the Federal Government and will presumably be prohibitive in cost–so be wary!

Loan repayment schedules have been improved. The new bill will limit payments to 10 percent of discretionary income and forgive balances after 20 years. But these changes only apply to loans taken out by new borrowers on or after July 1, 2014. They are not retroactive.

Public-service workers on the income-based repayment plan can have their remaining balances forgiven after 10 years. That’s the same as the old law.

Now the major challenge in front of us, is to make a new economy that provides jobs for college graduates and doesn’t reduce them to competing for the same jobs that high school graduates get in line for. So far there is too much of that going around, especially for an “advanced” “civilized” “modern” society. That is the mother of all assignments for the weekend. How to build a better economy. Here is my first suggestion: any business that is going to be sold by its owners or downsized by a Private Equity firm, is given first opportunity for purchase to the employees, who with government help to secure loans, can assume ownership and try to run the business as a profitable enterprise. Remember that one problem we have is what I call the “Microsoft Problem.” That is too many corporations trying to emulate Microsoft’s unseemly profit margins and as a result, workers pay has stagnated and they did not financially gain as their company productivity went up: savings from that source went into CEO pay and company profit margins to elevate the value of the stock. The golden parachute appeared and the gold watch went in the toilet.   Worker ownership should be less concerned about profits and more concerned about jobs and products. And, we know where the creativity for the place is typically found–yes in the workers. Remember the high financiers of today’s corporate world, understand a leveraged buyout, but don’t know how to make things. Making things is the key to an industrialized society with equitable wealth distribution. Everybody has a skill. We need to get all those Chrisitan militia people back to work as well. They are getting a little scary out in the hinterland.

RFM

    Print This Post Print This Post

Governor Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota: Reaganism’s last best hope?

Posted on December 10th, 2008 in Economy,Education,Politics by Robert Miller

On the national political level, the state of Minnesota is generally blue, with some touchy, sometimes alarming moments in certain elections, like the Bush vs Kerry election in 2004. That was close, but we still wound up in the blue column. But while the national politics of the state have been reliably liberal, the internal politics of the Minnesota have been quite a different story. As the Democratic Farm Labor (DFL) party that Hubert Humphrey put together began to implode in the 1970s, the Reagan Republican movement began to get a foothold and became a dominant factor in State politics ever since the mid 1980s. You have all heard about our governor, Republican Reaganite Tim Pawlenty. He was apparently on the short list for the vice presidential slot with John McCain, until he was suddenly swept aside for Sarah Palin. I am not sure whether you would have liked Pawlenty any better than you liked Sarah Palin, but one thing is certain–there are a lot of people in Minnesota who are tired of Pawlenty, if for no other reason than has made a political career out of being a tiresome governor. At a time when the state has lots of problems Pawlenty, like most Republicans is someone who is against most things and in favor of just a couple–not exactly the reassuring approach to problem solving. Had the Democrats put anyone up against Pawlenty in 2006, other than Mike Hatch, Pawlenty would probably be history. But Hatch committed the mother of all no-nos in Minnesota politics: he had a public temper tantrum. So Pawlenty got elected and continued on his march towards complete obscurity, greatly accelerated by our current fiscal crisis.

    Print This Post Print This Post