Corporate America wants your social security system to pay for the bailout

Posted on February 16th, 2009 in Economy,General,Politics by Robert Miller

We knew that something like this was bound to happen. It’s how the Republican forces have always worked and much to our dismay, they often get their way because of the power of corporate America. In Rick Perlstein’s book “Before the Storm” he illustrates how, in the wake of Barry Goldwater’s colossal defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 Presidential election, the political pundits of the time, such as James Reston of the New York Times and many others of that era, pronounced the conservative Republican movement as all but dead and certainly headed for the trash can of history. As a result of this commonly held belief, liberal Democrats dropped their guard and assumed that Johnson had clear sailing ahead for a more socialized agenda.

But unknown to almost everyone at the time, the Goldwater defeat was the beginning and not the end of the conservative Republican movement. It was Goldwater who, once the civil rights legislation had been passed under Johnson,  urged the Republican party to re-enter the South and convert the anti-civil rights Southern Democrats into Republicans. This suggestion led directly to Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” and eventually Ronald Reagan came into power and more specifically courted the right wing anti-racial Southern conservatives and began the religious indoctrination of the Republican party. As told by Bill Moyers, Lyndon Johnson’s Press Secretary, he came in to see Johnson immediately after a major Civil Rights Bill had been signed and found Johnson morose. Moyers asked him why he was sad, when he should be feeling jubilant for signing such a historic bill. Johnson replied “I have just given the South to the Republicans”–and so he had. The conversion of the Southern Democrats into a solid block of Southern Republican states, together with the Reagan Democrats, created a ruling block that controlled the White House for five of the next seven Presidential elections from 1980-2008 and provided many majorities in the House and Senate during that same period.

    Print This Post Print This Post

Pet peeves: things we don’t need to see again

Posted on February 12th, 2009 in Economy,Politics by Robert Miller

Pet peeves are by nature somewhat trivial, or at least they seem so when they first occur to us. Yet, it appears that in the modern era, our own pet peeves, which we are initially reluctant or embarrassed to share, turn out to be a peeve of nationally identified concern. We discover that our pet peeves are in the process of forming some large gigantic cultural movement that you knew nothing about until you became a latent peever and peeve sharer. Peeving is also becoming financially important since fixing some of our pet peeves can add up to a huge price tag of savings and dealing with them can also have many other consequences, especially if one considers the long-term effects of letting our peeves fester until we get some kind of unidentifiable skin rash.

Clearly, we have reached a cultural state where a lot of pet peeves, if properly identified and fixed, could save us resources and produce a more contented and relaxed state of mind. Peeves used to tell us something about ourselves, but more and more they tell us something about our culture, our nation–we are more and more becoming a nation bound together by our wounds, or, more accurately our peeves; it is surprising how one’s own set of peeves, once considered to be highly private and diverse, are now shared by giant swaths of our population and in some cases have reached a state of international recognition and concern. Many people are experiencing that their own pet peeves are fast becoming nationally favorite peeves, and as such, they represent issues that we are no longer ashamed to share and now believe they could in fact help shape the nation’s future, if dealt with properly. It would seem natural that peeve help groups are either formed or being formed as we consider what they really are. So peeves are no longer the trivial exercises we used to conceal to ourselves in a dark corner of a closet. Here are eight  pet peeves, that I believe we don’t need to hear about or see again, or better yet, insofar as they identify fractures in the cultural fault line, they need to be repaired and then moved out of sight:

1) We need to eliminate advertisements from investment firms implying that if we had invested with them we would still be making money (the only people who avoided losses were those that put it in their mattress–Treasury bills are mattress-like);
2) We need to eliminate drug company ads making up new diseases that can be treated with a brand new pill you need to tell your doctor about–like men urinating too frequently because they have presurgical prostatism (if you have to go to the bathroom before half-time you probably had too much beer–we should insist on product labeling derived from honesty in advertising,  like “This medication treats a disease that was recently invented in the laboratories of the Mercantile Drug Company”);

3) We don’t need drug company ads describing new medicines that erase the deficiencies of your anti-depressant which  probably didn’t work too well for you (they didn’t work very well because for the last thirty years, we have been building a depressing country and its equally depressing companion economy in which our children have a hard time making a decent living–yes iPods get cheaper, but the cost of owning a home (until recently), keeping your health insurance, college education–the things that really count for young people have been going up far faster than inflation. In this case product labeling could be “Recent events have raised the possibility that your brain chemistry is poorly tuned to meet the modern demands of our emerging culture. For that reason, we recommend that you take this anti-depressant supplement in addition to your normal anti-depressant to create a more modern, balanced brain chemistry, suitably tuned for the new contemporary lifestyle that includes  poverty, war, terrorism and frequent urination or incontinence”;

4) We need to eliminate Banks who get $ billions in public bailout that then turn around and jack up the interest rates on credit cards (we need to restore the old-fashioned usury laws that prevented financial institutions from making money off of lower income people–like most of America);
5) We need to change the government cost of living index that tells us we should all feel great about our economic prosperity, because our pay raises have been beating their convoluted evaluation of inflation, which misses or distorts the most important inflationary components of our lives (food, energy, education costs, housing). We need a real, simple, honest and transparent cost of living index that hits us all correctly right in the middle of the gut. We will know it when we feel it! We have to recognize that the cost of living for a young person is far higher than it is for people who already have their education, home and some health insurance.
6) We need to eliminate commercials by oil companies telling us to save on energy costs and look for new alternative modes of energy in the future, while, at the same time,  these same companies invest almost nothing in energy research on alternative fuels and continue to make the vast majority of their profits from good old fashioned fossil fuel extraction;
7) We need to eliminate notices that blame Americans for being obese when the foods and beverages available, including fast foods, contain so much fat and so many calories, that obesity is not only predictable for many, but rather hard to avoid. Let’s put a little blame on the kinds of foods that we make available to our children (soda pop machines in the school hallways, each 12 oz can of which contains enough sugar to promote Type II diabetes in young adulthood when a single can of pop is consumed each day–that data comes from a World Health Organization (WHO) report, whose release in this country was virtually ignored by our media). How about product labeling on a Coke–”warning, consumption of this product can lead to diabetes and premature death.”

8) We don’t need anymore news reports that tell us Bernie Madoff is doing just fine living in his multimillion dollar mansion where he will remain until his trial is over, perhaps in a zillion years from now. I suppose it would be useful to know that, if he is broke, as reports seem to indicate, is the Federal Government paying his property taxes or mortgage payment if he has one? That’s the sort of news we might like to hear about–a little more about what it’s costing taxpayers and a little less on whether Bernie is enjoying himself and making new friends. If the taxpayers are putting up $ for his maintenance, perhaps he could move into more appropriate quarters to cut down on costs. He hasn’t been convicted yet, so you can’t throw him in jail unless he is a flight risk. I don’t know how many floors above Earth’s surface Bernie’s pad is, but isn’t jumping out a window a flight risk?

The above are pet peeves for juvenile peevers or peeve starters, including those who are brand new to pet peeve sharing; as you can see they barely scratch the curvature of the peeve surface, but they are suitable for beginners. They relate to some of the things we don’t need to hear about ever again, or, better yet, they describe some things that need serious (and not so serious) fixing. Undoubtedly you have a list of your own. If so, feel free to pile on! Many of the above peeves could be eliminated if we all watched C-Span.

RFM

    Print This Post Print This Post

On the road back from dictatorship

Posted on February 10th, 2009 in Politics by Robert Miller

Perhaps not everyone shares my view that, under George W. Bush’s presidency, thanks to the imperial reach achieved largely by Vice President Dick Cheney, we were/are/have been marching towards an American dictatorship, promoted by fear brought about by 9/11. I still believe that we are just one additional terrorist attack within our borders before we fall over the edge into the abyss of a military style autocracy. Perhaps Obama has started us on the road back, but we have a long way to go before we are out of the woods, before we can put on that comfort coat that seemed more naturally American just eight years ago.

Last night however, may be the beginning of something new, perhaps a significant step back towards the country we used to know. Senator Patrick Leahy announced yesterday that he had been thinking about a forming a ” truth commission” to look into possible violations of the law committed by members of the Bush administration.  When I heard the announcement yesterday, I didn’t think that Leahy would go off half-cocked without clearing his intentions with the White House. Sure enough, last night during Obama’s press conference, he was asked about investigations into Bush-era lawbreaking. His reply was jolting and different from what he has said previously. To paraphrase, he said that his administration needed to look forward, but if violations of the law had taken place, he expected that mechanisms would be put in place to deal with such possibilities. In other words, it sounded to me as though he was giving a subtle version (too subtle for many reporters, since I later read that Obama had given the cold shoulder to Leahy) of a green light to Leahy’s plans, if not a subtle form of encouragement.

Now there is a report in the Huffington Post that Leahy has talked with White House Council Greg Craig about a “truth and reconciliation commission” and that he intends to get the facts out about possible criminal actions of the White House during the Bush years, although no agreement has been reached for White House approval. However, he did indicate that the Senate and House will probably go ahead even if the White House does not approve, as they have the traditional responsibility of oversight. Apparently the main looming targets for Leahy include the false justification for the invasion of Iraq, the attempted purging of United States District Attorneys and the justification for the use of torture in violation of the Geneva Convention.
If we as a country believe ourselves to be the self-appointed beacon of democracy and freedom, as we tend to proselytize to the rest of the world, we should welcome, indeed, we should insist on an open national discussion on how and why the Bush administration made so many disastrous decisions and then backed them up with a complete disregard for the facts. Bush’s supporters need to know that he thought they were stupid and would fall for anything. He went by the old rule book that says once you establish a wide-spread sense of fear and anxiety in the country, you are supposed to be able to justify your behavior with just about any story you want to pull out of your hat. Well, I guess about 20% of the population never gave up on the Bush stories, but of course we know that the 20% of those polled that remained ever faithful to his primal grinning were not uniformly distributed within the geographic limits of the United States. This story could truly be interesting and has now been given a set of legs. Let’s see how far it goes! It might be the only relief we get from the anti-buoyancy reports we continue to get about the economy. I am sure you still share my disbelief about how something like sub-prime mortgages, even if wrapped into strange securities and sold under false pretenses, could do as much damage to our economy as we are witnessing today. Seems like a house of match sticks!
RFM

    Print This Post Print This Post
« Previous PageNext Page »