In the 2004 Presidential election, John Kerry was the winner based on exit polling data. But GW Bush won the electoral college election, with Ohio turning out to be the critical state that finally went for Bush by a margin of a little over 100,00 votes; with that, we got four more years of the downward spiral we have been in since 9/11. Robert F. Kennedy Jr, a voting rights lawyer, analyzed the Ohio election and claimed that Republicans prevented more than 350,000 votes from being cast for Kerry, enough to give him the presidency. Voter fraud by the Republicans has become a mainstream tactic for them and has been accelerated to an unprecedented level for this year’s election. Kennedy and BBC journalist Greg Palast have written in Rolling Stone and the Huffington Post about the this year’s intense efforts, especially in the swing states like Colorado and Ohio, to implement voter intimidation, illegal removal of voters who are going through foreclosure, and the insistence of proof of registration, such as a photo ID which many poor people lack. The claim is that as many as 10 million voters could be removed from participating in this year’s election, either by being removed from the voter rolls, or through intimidation and misinformation. Kennedy and Palast believe that if Obama is going to win, he will need enough votes to compensate for the immense voter fraud that will take place in this election. They have opened up a website stealbackyourvote.org where, for a small donation, you can download a comic book (or order reprints–after making your donation, you get an email linking to the download site) that explains the ways in which voter fraud/suppression have been elevated to a high art form. A distinction is made between voter fraud, the act of fraudulently voting or removing a ballot and voter suppression, which is turning away eligible voters by intimidation and misinformation. By far the latter mechanism wins hands down as the method of choice, since no paper trail is left from that exercise. Poor, uneducated voters are more likely to react to these methods of intimidation and misinformation.
Print This Post